"In response to the conversation Elle Stanger started in her
article “Minimum Wage Strippers?” I have some comments and points I wanted to
make:
Legally, workers are either
employees or independent contractors.
Right now, strippers in Oregon are classified as independent contractors. Yet,
many of the clubs in Portland treat strippers as employees. Clubs cannot have
their cake and eat it too. Strippers deserve fair working conditions, whether
that is as employees or independent contractors. Ideally, clubs could decide
for themselves whether they want to classify strippers as employees or
independent contractors, depending on their environment and financial
structure.
Tax-wise, there are a couple of major differences between
those who are categorized as employees and those who are categorized as
independent contractors. Employees have taxes automatically withheld from their
paychecks whereas independent contractors are expected to pay their taxes in
quarterly or annual payments to the IRS. The second major difference is that
independent contractors must file taxes even on very small amounts of income,
unlike employees who are usually exempt from filing taxes unless they make more
than roughly $5400. Also, the IRS is not limited merely to auditing employees;
the IRS can also perform audits on independent contractors – even those who
don’t file taxes. Tax-wise, it is illegal
to not file your taxes, regardless of how much you make.
Independent contractor taxes seem really high, and it
doesn’t feel fair to many strippers, many of whom don’t make a ton, to pay
those. But they only seem high because they are paid in different ways. As an
independent contractor you are responsible for all of your Social Security and
Medicare taxes; an employee has the benefit of their employer taking on some of
those taxes, so employees pay less of those taxes. Yes, as an employee, taxes
are taken out of your paycheck. But depending on how much you make, those taxes
may make less of a dent than independent contractor taxes otherwise would. And
you are also operating legally in the tax system (as opposed to not filing your
taxes).
I don’t know if it would be beneficial for strippers to be
classified as employees, because I really don’t know how that might impact
their total income and the tipping structure and tipping culture. But, it is
not fair for clubs to exert the control they do (outfit and shoes, pubic hair,
music, stage performance, private dance guidelines, mandatory tip-outs, etc.)
without then giving strippers the benefits that accompany that kind of control
(sick leave, workers compensation, unemployment, etc.). Clubs need to be held
accountable for how they treat their workers.
As a stripper myself, I understand that some strippers do profit from
the system as it is now (and many really don’t seem to care one way or the
other). However, I think that many strippers would benefit more from clubs
sticking to a clear system. I think it is demoralizing to be controlled in the
ways that I am at work, without also receiving the benefits of being an
employee. Either, let me work the way I want to (don’t regulate my outfit,
force me to pay your other employees money, or force me to dance to your
music), or control my behavior (which you already do) and give me the real benefits of being an employee."
No comments:
Post a Comment